<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L Train rated the cleanest</title>
	<link>http://writingny.blsci.org/2008/04/07/l-train-rated-the-cleanest/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip Josolowitz-Luce</title>
		<link>http://writingny.blsci.org/2008/04/07/l-train-rated-the-cleanest/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Josolowitz-Luce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writingny.blsci.org/2008/04/07/l-train-rated-the-cleanest/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>This story is an absolute goldmine. There are so many different pieces you could do on the MTA and public transit.  The L train is probably one of the better ones because the improvements in technology should let the MTA run more trains on existing track at closer intervals.  Imagine if the whole transit system had 20% more trains?  It would be so much less crowded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is an absolute goldmine. There are so many different pieces you could do on the MTA and public transit.  The L train is probably one of the better ones because the improvements in technology should let the MTA run more trains on existing track at closer intervals.  Imagine if the whole transit system had 20% more trains?  It would be so much less crowded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
